Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Hottest Market in San Jose EVERGREEN

    
EVERGREEN      
                    
            Publisher SANDY KAY   at sandy@sandykayhomes.com       
Date    9/21/2011    Issue 1


Supply decreases as demand grows for affordable homes                        in high school Score areas
This year there have been 141 sales in the 95148 area code where the current elementary schools:  Norwood  (API score 887) /Carolyn Clarke (API score 955  /Millbrook (API score 873) have high and increasing  aptitude performance indexes.  Most of the home  discussed in this newsletter are in the Quimby Oak middle school district which has a score of 871 up from 828 in 2010 and Evergreen High (838 API score). Compared to Almaden, Cupertino, Saratoga /Los Gatos and farther north on the Peninsula, prices are at a bargain. 95148 and 95135 are the only zip codes on the south Peninsula where all three schools have high school scores.  Prices are likely to start moving upwards.

Sale prices ranged from the mid 200’s which were predominantly REOs to $1080000  (also an REO or bank owned property). Sixty three homes were priced over $550000 and the high end of this range was predominantly REOs or short sales. Homes between 600and 840K were predominantly regular sales  in better condition then the short sales.
The highest prices were in the newer part (<15 years old) of the Evergreen area south of Quimby and North of Aborn.  Between 800 and 900K there were often several offers or very quick sales as the year has progressed. The market is definitely hot and getting hotter as there is almost no inventory remaining in the area.  Older homes (>15 years ) in the area closest to Murillo sold for prices well over 650K and with multiple offers if the homes were larger and remodeled.  Typically original homes did not sell as well compared to the 2007 time frame where everything sold.

There were 78 homes that sold below 550K and they were spread fairly evenly between the areas east and west of White Rd. Only one home sold in this price range east of Ruby. The average home size was 1481 sq ft.
Out of this group 19 were bank owned property, 33 short sales and 25 regular sales.  Almost all the homes that sold below 440K were short sales or REOs.

2010 to 2011
In 2010 there were 238 homes sold in the same area compared to the 141 homes sold in 2011. The 16 homes which sold for over 1 million were mostly regular sales and the highest priced home was $1285000 down from the $1449000 asking price. This home was on the market for just over a year. In reality the price difference of the high end sale was based on recognition of the depth of the economic status of the nation combined with lack of inventory in 2011.  Over 700K, few homes in 2010 were short sales as compared to 2011 as the economy affects the mid price range sector.


Consistently many of the sales below 550K were in fact short sales or REOs in 2010. At 122 homes, the number sold in the lower price ranges almost matched the number sold all together in Evergreen in 2011. They were about 1/3 short sales, 1/3 REOs and 1/3 regular sales which is actually better than the county average of 50% short sales and bank owned sales and 50% regular sales according to Chicago Title’s statistics. This reflects the general higher quality of the Evergreen neighborhood discussed.  In the lowest price range most sales were bank owned or short sales.

Current Prospects
There are 36 homes on the market now in this zip code and 15 of these are over $680000.  Only one of these homes is bank owned which may be a reflection of the HAMP/HAFA programs and facilitated and stream lined short sale processes adopted by the banks.
Fifty three homes are still in escrow pending sale and they are almost all short sales which may or may not close and actually sell. These are ones to now start watching closely as the market inventory tightens to a poor supply.

This newsletter is my summary of the sales in Evergreen 95148 and the accuracy is taken from the real estate multiple listing service and some numbers are rounded for communication purposes. For information on homes in this area please contact me through my email or website:
Sandy@sandykayhomes.com or 408 202 0608. I am always happy to discuss the area and have successfully closed 4 sales in 95148 since the beginning of the year ; two short sales at the million dollar level, one REO and one regular sale for my buyers and sellers. I am constantly following the market in Evergreen and hope to provide useful information to future buyers and sellers.

CALL SANDY KAY   408 202 0608
Fireside Realty
2111 Lincoln Ave San Jose 95125



Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Mortgage Relief or More Mess?

There has been a lot of talk about the new $20 billion bail out to address  robo-signing  and bank practices of the years before the market fell out from under us.  This most recently off the press:


Foreclosure Settlement Imminent Bank Sources Say


Foreclosure Settlement Imminent Bank Sources Say

Will we be able to make a deal with the banks regarding their errors in making loans that could not be paid?  Banks are not talking, but it is likely that the money will be caught up in a bureacratic nightmare. The thought has been that this money would provide mortgage relief to struggling homeowners by allowing more relaxed loan modification  for people who need mortgage relief because their homes are underwater (they owe more than the home is worth.)
Only problem is case in point: someone lost their job - they would qualify for a loan modification -- that is what might be considered a hardship. In fact the program then denies the loan modification if the individual got their job back? What is wrong with that picture? I would think that's exactly the type of person who would need mortgage relief because they actually can and have the ability to reinstate their status and payments if they are given some kind of help. The individual is still at risk despite the systems approach to the problem.
In a seminar with Wells Fargo/Wachovia recently the reps stated that they are taking each individual on a personal basis and the talk was promising. They even mentioned 90 day lates would be considered but definitely the time to approach the bank would be before a late payment is made. HAMP/HAFA ruling and law states that you must receive a written denial for a loan modification from the bank before your home can be foreclosed. After foreclosure the ability to reinstate seems likely to be an expensive and near impossible prospect for a displaced homeowner or one that is going that way.

So what problems are homeowners still facing?
The difficulty in making their payments: health issues, lost jobs, balloon payments coming due and the past inappropriate lending practices (they never should have gotten the home in the first place), pulled cash out and overspeculated are still in place. No one thinks the goose with the golden egg has flown in.

What about the people who are underwater with two loans where they took money out and speculated on a business  or maybe a motor boat and vacation. Are these cases separate or lumped together? After all the motor boat isn't worth what they bought if for, the vacation money is spent and the business went under. Should both homeowners be rewarded for bad business planning?  SB 458 -- the new law that says that banks can not go after the borrower for the principal of the second loan after they grant a short sale. That stopped a short sale I had in progress with Chase bank for about a month costing my buyers very ethical loan agent several thousand dollars to extend the loan lock. It was a hiccup that we got through and the bank allowed the short sale to proceed. It was a win win situation where family helped relocate the seller and the buyers are happy with their new home but it took experience and persistence.  But what about the seller's future taxes? It is possible that the seller will see tax bills for the second she took out for her business since the loan WAS a refinanced, recourse loan.
Last there is discussion of reversing the tax benefits for mortgage interest. For investment homes its likely a  change is necessary to improve our economic portfolio. For primary home owners struggling to make payments it spells disaster.
 One thing I am sure -- its not fair. Ok well is life ever fair? Probably not but what is the bail out really about that's what I want to know. Is it possible that it will just move forward denial of loan modifcations and allow the banks to more rapidly repossess the homes?

 Inquiring minds want to know. Stay tuned for future discussions on resolution to these problems.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS


The real estate market is experiencing some upward price trends contrary to general information in the media – no surprise  - its families buying and moving to areas with good schools. Homes in prized areas where school rank high 800’s and 900’s in API  (Academic Performance Index)  school score are the targets.  Consequently areas that have high APIs in all school sectors:   Elementary, Middle and High Schools like Cupertino, Saratoga, Almaden and Evergreen are the really hot markets with multiple bids on properties.

My listing at 3328  Arqueado Dr San Jose 95148  MLS #81105885


 is a  4 bedroom 2 bath home  on a great street; quiet and nice neighbors. If you have kids and live there you are entitled to go to  top schools Quimby Oak Middle School with an API of 813 is really sought after and Evergreen Valley High school API 838.   The designated elementary school is Cedar Grove which is a good school (API 813) but grades 2 and 3 are saturated – or so the school says and if its API you are after, then act now and put in for a transfer with a “school choice form”. What that means is that if you are accepted in through the lottery system then your child can transfer to Norwood Creek Elementary (API 872), Carolyn Clark (API 938) or Evergreen Elementary (API 916) for all the grades.  But act now because the applications close  April 21, 2011.  You will be notified before August.   Maybe that’s better than paying a lot more with multiple bidders for a lesser home. Newer homes have smaller back yards and narrower streets. Don’t estimate the value of a well built and well maintained home with a few years.


Currently you can go to the district office to find boundary maps or to greatschools.org to determine if the home you are interested in purchasing is in the school area that you want. A tip most home buyers don’t know is that schools may become saturated and newly registered kids will have to go to alternative schools.  Also some school that may not have as high school scores, actually have better art and liberal studies programs..  Don’t overlook the value of programs for a single number like API.

Life style is not just about schools. A prudent buyer should look at location first , safety and stability of neighborhood, the homes amenities.  Bedrooms and the overall construction are also important. Remodeling can be minor or major. I am an experienced agent with experience in that capacity. Add up the cost of upgrades before you jump on a poorly maintained and kept short sale where there are a never ending number of surprises with deferred maintenance from the previous owners. 

So what should investors do?  They should cross schools with size of the home, construction, price, location based on jobs and shopping and other amenities. Currently we at sandykayhomes.com are working on just such a map. We want to find the hot investment areas or future areas of gentrification that might just be diamonds in the rough for the man with cash who wants to make money in the California market.  Call Sandy Kay at 408 202 0608 and ask me about it ...and happy hunting.


Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Sales go on and on and on!

I remember the good old days when you could take a client out and find a home that you like and make an offer and if everyone was on the same page, the client could move in within a month or so. No more. sales go on and on and on since most of them are bank sales. The banks are not at all interested in contract timelimes or contingencies. Negotiations may take months or just disappear into the void where someone (who knows who) is evaluating a good offer. No wonder buyers walk and move on to other prospects in frustration.  Appraisals have to be renewed every three months and should there be a compliant seller they have to renew their information to the bank every 60 days or so.

So 2010 has been interesting. I have seen properties where sellers have been living in bank owned homes a year after the bank has owned the property and no one has evicted them. The sellers are still trying to sell the home and the sellers agent is representing the seller!  I showed a home the other day and the seller informed me that they were planning to take everything in the house that wasn't nailed down when they leave and a lot of things that were nailed down. Another seller I spoke to has no where to go and no plans and my buyers loan funds in two weeks.

Most of my day is spent on hold with the bank waiting to hear from someone who doesn't have an answer!

All the forecasts say the economy is improving and certainly folks spent this Christmas -- well its no wonder, they aren't paying mortgages, rent and some of them are collecting rents on properties where they are in default. Crazy world. The reality though is that insurance, health costs, commodity prices and gas prices are going up. So what did Betty davis say; "fasten your seat belts, we are in for a bumpy ride."  The foreclosures are by no means over. I ran the loan to value ratio in an upscale townhome complex not that long ago and guess what -- one in four people had equity in their property. So if anyone there loses a job or changes their financial situation there are predicted foreclosures. 

Plus there is my conscience. It's no fun to work with people that are having huge financial problems. Consequently, I have found just about every legal way to help sellers in default and will continue to help with financing counseling and problem solving and trouble shooting loan modifications. Most people need support and gradually get educated on the changes to their financial picture so that they can move forward with life in 2011.  Nonetheless I am very happy that we have legal support at my office because the problem solving is pretty tricky and I want expert second opinions at my fingertips.

Sandy Kay

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Home Loans: Being upside down and staying afloat

Well as the ink on my last blog dries on the virtual page, I got this note and article from my friend Carl Reuter:

Sandy:
I wanted to thank you. I was about to default on my loan when I found out how underwater I was on my place and you were the one coaching me not to miss payments and to look at other options. That caused me to do a lot of research and to go up to bat with my lender and get a serious principle reduction and I managed to get refi'd through another lender. I ended up writing a few short articles on the process in hopes it may help others to get out from under similar debts.
Thanks again, Carl

I share the following in hopes it may help fellow homeowners in crisis.
Myself, along with many others in America are “upside down” or “underwater” on their homes. I found I’d be lucky to get half of what I’d paid for it and I found the bank wouldn’t give me a re-finance to get out from under my 5 year fixed interest only loan. With the economic slowdown my income had decreased dramatically as well. I started to research my options as it didn’t make sense to keep paying for a home I owed $450k on that was worth less than $300k.
A little research taught me that 95% of the folks that go to their mortgage company for a “loan modification” end up defaulting on the loan. If one gets behind in payments the bank is happy to add all those costs onto the back end of the loan and may lower the payment amount and possibly reduce the interest rate but it will cost you and they will not forgive any of the principle. You end up with an even bigger loan! The common misconception is that the lender won’t even talk over options unless you’re already behind in payments. At that point you are faced with foreclosure, which wrecks your credit for 7-10 years or you could “short sale” the home for less than fair market value which would only ding your credit for 2 years. I found the option by not defaulting. I Googled the topic and was able to untangle myths from facts and discovered the “Short payoff re-fi”, also called a “short re-fi” or “short payoff”.
If you qualify, you can negotiate your loan down and still keep your house. Here’s how it works; the homeowner secures a loan elsewhere, essentially a re-fi, but for slightly less than the current market value of the home and they or a third party loan mod specialist presents that offer to their original lender and convinces that bank to accept a lesser payoff, making it clear that the borrower will have to short sale the home or default on the loan if the offer is refused due to financial hardship. The short payoff re-fi means a lesser loss for the bank since the home refinances for about the price of the future short sale and eliminates the costs of foreclosure. As more banks like BofA and Citibank, are seeing the merits of these types of payoff, they are allowing it. You may find a list of banks online. I’ve been dealing with Citibank but and found some of the folks in their short sale department didn’t have a clue about the new short refi program. I went to my mortgage broker and had to educate him as well. Besides being at a lot better interest rate, my monthly payments will drop by over a grand. The whole process took 6-8 weeks. Citibank got a “broker price opinion” of the property value, their appraisal, and negotiated my payoff based on that value.

Before you get too excited here’s the catch; you have to be able to qualify for a FHA loan which is the only one approved for short payoffs, still have good credit, no missed payments, only one loan on the property and prove some financial hardship. It also helps if the original loan is owned by the bank rather than a third party investor. I believe that is called a portfolio loan and it simplifies the process because the bank doesn’t have to get approval from investors.

I originally Googled for “short payoff refi” and found links to some companies that will do all the legwork for around $3000. It’s illegal in California for them to take any money from you till escrow closes so they basically work for free, hoping all the pieces will fit together and get paid at the end. This unfortunately means they may not work as hard on these types of loans and in my case I got discouraged at the slow responses I got and decided to do the legwork myself. Its taken a lot of phone calls and internet research to get the facts straight. I can see why more people don’t know about these options.

None of us signed up for home loans thinking we would one day face losing our homes or be forced to renegotiate the amount we owed just to keep the home. For many of us offering the bank less is the only option and before we shed a tear over their loss, go see Michael Moore’s newest movie, Capitalism- A Love Story. I am no expert on any of this so please don’t seek me out for advice. I encourage you to do your own research, tell everyone you know that’s in this situation and be persistent. Go to your mortgage broker and educate him or her, get the new loan, pay your old loan off for what the house is really worth and don’t forget to get your taxes reassessed for the new value of the home. Good luck.

Carl Reuter is a local renewable energy contractor and long time resident of Santa Cruz that loves living here even though it’s a costly place to call home.

Saturday, September 11, 2010

My Life Raft for the American Economy

Since I’m on the subject of exploding oaks, I might as well start discussing the American economy. Last year we were 11.7 trillion dollars in debt. Where are we now? Going up -- 13.53 million in debt. That is a scary number. The question I have to ask myself is where is the money going to come from to replace that debt?

Lets look at a couple of facts. What hasn’t changed? The unemployment rate and the foreclosure rate in the last year haven’t changed. About 9.6 % of Americans are unemployed and about 5% of homes are in some point of foreclosure. That hasn’t changed but the American debt has. Why?

It’s not that the government isn’t trying. First they created more jobs so now one in six Americans work for the federal government. Wait – that doesn’t seem right either. Clearly if the government is going into MORE debt how are they going to keep paying these workers? I doubt anyone anywhere across the sectors is feeling super confident about the sustainability of their jobs these days particularly if you just listen to the media.

Typically the government buys mortgage backed securities and counts on the profit as the debt is repaid or sold. As property values decrease and people remain in their homes and just stop paying the mortgages, the liquid value of those assets diminish adding to the federal debt. Hence the Federal Reform Act with the programs to prop up the unpaid mortgage debt. The feds said “we will give you the opportunity to stay in your home by lowering your interest rate, extending the length of your mortgage or paying you to leave if everything else has failed.” The bonus is at no cost to your credit. The reality however was simple – almost no one benefited from these programs and the money for them is all but used up. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are close to bankruptcy.

Traditionally the deficit in the treasury is returned through taxation but no one wants that, least of all any guy who wants to be reelected. The guy who is barely making his mortgage anyway doesn’t want that either or he might now able to pay his mortgage. No equity, working harder, still able to pay a mortgage on a house that they have little confidence will be valued what it was in 2007? They are not going to vote for the guy that says their taxes are going up so the administration regardless of bull or bear avoids that tactic.

It was actually pretty exciting to cold call a prospective client and hear an excited voice: I reduced my mortgage and got to stay in my house. That was the exception. My broker explains it best. You’ve got three choices. “You can stare out into the ocean and claim it’s not an iceberg, you can rearrange the chairs on the titanic or you can start building a life raft.” I’m of the unsinkable Molly Brown character. I’m hammering as fast as I can. So when I too hit the wall of diminishing income relative to the number of houses that I own I took a big step back. I cried, denied and then went to work. The secret is time, the need for change and the ability to incrementally change the reality we live in. The Zen Buddhists say that you should do everything slowly; less stress and more success. The fear and discomfort we want to believe by reading the newspapers is probably greater than the reality. So I’m really going out on a limb here and I predict that overall the market is actually going to get better not worse and I’m going to give you the reasons.

Now I can’t take credit for everything that I have said. What spawned this conversation is a Silicon Valley Association of Realtors breakfast meeting yesterday where I got some of the statistical facts I just presented. Rick Soukoulis from the Loan Source in San Jose gave the talk. He really made me sit forward when he put the same graph on the screen that I have been carrying around in my pocket since I came back to selling real estate a few months ago.


It’s an ugly picture really. What it says is we are going into three years of more failures and foreclosures due to the option arm loans. I would have to say that the investors are still holding pretty tight to their money on that basis. Is it all true? Well not across the sectors. The entry level housing is being driven pretty hard by three things; the American dream to own a home, the strength of the FHA programs and the up and coming “echo boomers” that don’t have bad mortgages and have the youth and health to work hard and afford their homes. If you look at the entry level housing, a lot of it is in escrow.

You talk to the stock market analysts and they will tell you what you are looking at when you look at this double hump – it’s called a “shoulder.” Long term it doesn’t mean anything. Blow it up over time and it means that the market is going to trade sideways for awhile and then reverse and come back. Good homes will hold their value. Bad homes won’t.

So what was Rick selling yesterday? He was selling private money. The Loan Source is a mortgage banker and they can do in house appraisals and have their own money to fund a loan. That can be a beautiful thing. “That can speed up a transaction,” he said. Typical mortgage brokers package your loan and might send it to Nebraska to get you the best rate, but if Nebraska denies the loan you might not get the loan at all. One of the government responses to the nasty sort of lending practices that we saw in recent years was to create a big pool of appraisers and deny a mortgage broker the right to use the guy with whom he had built a relationship of trust. It also wiped out the guys that were juggling numbers to make a property appraise that really wasn’t worth that value. The problem is if the “pool” appraiser has a lot of sales nearby then it’s easy but if he’s not from the area and really doesn’t understand local value then it might be as wrong an evaluation as before or worse. The other thing the government did was take away the portability of loans meaning that if the broker packages the loan and it’s denied, he might not be able to package it again. Sale fails. Wait a minute – the reason the mortgage broker was sending it to Nebraska in the first place was to get you the lowest interest rate possible. Take that away and it means a perfectly good credit worthy buyer may have to get a higher interest rate. That’s just plain wrong. Ultimately it still comes down to how much does the guy know that’s working on your loan.

Google the “Center for American Progress” and you’ll be getting info from some of the brightest eggheads in the numbers game. They are talking a lot about “privatization.” With Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac becoming Tom, Dick and Harry the eggheads are out there looking for money. Duh. The investors are just waiting to buy property at 30 cents on the dollar and resell to us at 75 cents on the dollar. Nothing really changes except government restrictions. The feds say each entity that originates a loan, bank or other, will get “rating” based on the institution’s history, stability and performance. Kind of like an API score for schools. The government has put out the Moody’s report to rate a lender. The better the rating, the more likely you are to go to that entity. The government is trying to level the playing field by categorizing it, organizing it and trying to manage it. Rick says the past where 70% of loan origination comes from mortgage brokers is over and 80% of them will go out of business.

Only thing is I have a problem with numbers. It’s not because I can’t do them - I have an advanced epidemiology and statistics degree. Ok, so I made a film about risk analysis rather than learn my chi squared analysis by heart. I just wasn’t the type to sleep in math classes behind people that had triangular heads at 8 am. I did get one thing out of that year though. You can manipulate numbers a lot and a rating is one number. Nothing should be determined based on one number. I also have loyalty and no one is going to talk me out of my own mortgage broker that quickly by saying he is a dying breed.


A lender has to know how to make a loan work. Meet Terry Gordon, president of First Funding, in Campbell. He works in an unassuming building on Bascom Ave. When you walk through the front door and meet Melody, Terry’s congenial and knowledgeable wife and partner, you already feel at ease. Then you go to Terry’s office. Enter the Command Center. There is nothing in this room that feels like the past – you have entered the space age. Terry is a good sized man with a chair that swivels smoothly in the center of an armada of computers. Terry is the spreadsheet wizard. Tell him your story and in a matter of 10 minutes he will tell you whether what you want to happen will. He will always qualify his statements with the possibility of other options but ultimately I haven’t found him to be wrong yet. If he can’t do the loan he’ll tell you why and where you can try. He will help you with financial planning and ease your through the possibilities for your future with honesty and experience. Besides how can you not trust a guy with that has a fondness for spotted fluffy dogs, party cocker spaniels. Before you go to other brokers or websites where you have to fill out squares and tabs and likely spend money before you get an answer, why not just try the old fashioned way – pick up the phone and make a call. And as for rates – my clients have all said he got them the best.

But Rick is right, Terry can’t do everything. He’ll tell you when he can’t. Try Rick or Julie Baxter at the Loan Source if you need a mortgage banker. Try not to worry and take things more slowly.What ever you do, don’t default, plan. Get a financial analysis of your future. Decide whether you can stay comfortable in the home you live in. If not make plans to downsize and get your profit at the other end – a good home that’s going to appreciate not a home that is in a stagnant market. Walk away intact with cash in your pocket and start over without ruining your credit. Don’t get on the titanic at all. I plan on looking at that big double hump of loan failures in another way. I took on a mascot with a double hump. He’s going to take you slowly and surely to one place, the Oasis. Give us a call, your agent. We’re free, we’re conscientious and we’re reliable.

Friday, August 27, 2010

The Oak Story Continues

So the amusing speculation about why oaks explode when there in no rain or lightning still remains a mystery.  So many things in life are.  I am positive that the change of our beautiful 85 degree weather to 105 over night had something very much to do with it.
Laila Zaccaraiah, my agent at Allstate, mentioned that I was the second call that day regarding an exploding oak.  I had even seen an old oak fall on a barn in hot weather before.

Heat causes things to expand and if the liquid sap in the tree expanded more rapidly then the dry crust of the tree could handle then maybe it was too much for the oak and the tree had to give somewhere.  Down goes the branch on Gustavo's car.

So feet back down to reality.   Who is going to pay for his car?  I remember hitting a deer once when I was driving in the back country between Paso Robles and San Simeon to the horse farm owned by Mrs. William Randolph Hearst.  Boom.  No way around it.  The car insurance company paid 100%, no deductible out of my posket.  It was an "act of God" they said.  I think they took the deer fur off the bumper.  It wasn't my fault.

Regarding my homeowners policy: au contraire.  If we had maintained the tree properly which we did by removing excess dead wood from the frame and kept the oak healthy, then it wasn't our fault.  No liability, no payment.  If we neglected the tree and it was sickly, then it was out fault and the insurance company would pay for it.  Problem was then we look like neglectful people.  All that means is a recipe for the insurance company to raise our rates.  Catch 22.  Still no way to fairly get Gustavo's car fixed.

I asked Gustavo to call his car insurance company.  Hopefully they will shed some light on the situation and help out.  Meanwhil I'm feeling bad about his car and a $3126 bill.

My father used to say.  Don't bother paying insurance.  Take every penny that you spend on insurance: that's about 8-10% of my income and put it in investments.  You'll have a lot more money. I wonder if he was right.